Evaluating Turbidity Standards: The Technical and Operational Advantages of Styrene-DivinylBenzene (SDVB)

4 HORIBA LAQUA Formazin or Styrene-divinylbenzene Standards

Accurate turbidity measurement relies on calibration against traceable reference standards, most commonly Formazin or Styrene-divinylbenzene (SDVB). While applications may vary between Formazin and SDVB, HORIBA’s TB220 Portable Turbidity Meter utilizes SDVB standards, providing a stable and reliable calibration solution tailored for high-precision applications.


Some differences between Formazin and SDVB are summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Differences between Formazin and SDVB

 Formazin1SDVB
   
Composition
Insoluble polymer formed by reacting hydrazine sulfate and hexamethylene-tetramine (HMTA).Suspension of styrene-divinylbenzene 
polymer microspheres.

Appearance
Dense, opaque white suspension at high concentrations. Yellowish-white appearance at lower concentrations.Milky-white, stable suspension.

Type of Standard
Primary turbidity reference standard2.Secondary standard – traceable to Formazin primary standard2.

Stability and Shelf Life
  • Highly sensitive to temperature2.
  • High tendency to settle and form floc2.
  • Only stable at high concentrations2 
> 400 NTU>1 year
20-400 NTU1 month
2-20 NTU12-24 hours
<2 NTU<1 hour
  • 1 year.
  • Does not settle, uniform particle size4.

Safety and Handling
  • Toxic precursor chemicals (hydrazine sulfate and hexamethylenetetramine are poisonous and carcinogenic2), requires careful preparation.
  • Proper disposal according to chemical waste rules and regulations.
  • Non-hazardous/non-toxic4.
  • Ready-to-use3.

Optical properties
  • Made up of polymer chains of varying lengths, which fold in random configurations. 
  • Wide array of particle shapes and sizes, ranging from <0.1µm to >10µm.
  • Reproducible light scattering pattern2.
  • Inert, spherical polymer microbeads.
  • Narrow bead size range, from 0.06µm to 0.2µm.
  • Ideal for characterizing light scatter at 90° 4.
  • Minimal variation across different lots3.

Applications
Primary turbidity calibration, used by many standards5
(US EPA 180.1, ISO 7027, APHA Method 21306).
  • Used for routine checks of calibration stability, without the need for preparing fresh formazin dilutions2
  • Suitable for field use where dilution using pure, turbidity-free water and necessary volumetric glassware under controlled conditions is not feasible4
  • Under ISO 7027-1 and US EPA 180.1, acceptable alternative to be used as a calibration standard8,9.

In summary, SDVB standards are advantageous because:

  • It has better stability (1 year) compared to formazin (hours to months, depending on the concentration), therefore minimizing the need for constant preparation of fresh standard. Diluted formazin standards (2-20 NTU) often require fresh preparation every 24 hours. For turbidity standards lesser than 2 NTU, it is extremely challenging to accurately prepare as the necessary dilution ratio is so high that even a small variation in the volumes measured can lead to a high level of uncertainty2.
  • It is safe, commercially available, and comes in ready-to-use bottles3. The preparation of formazin involves the usage of toxic chemicals like hydrazine sulfate, which is a known carcinogen2, and requires strict personal protective equipment (PPE) during preparation and appropriate waste disposal protocols in place. 
  • It is ideal for use in the field, where dilution of formazin using pure water and volumetric glassware is not practical4.
  • It is recognized for use under ISO 7027-1 and US EPA 180.1 as a primary turbidity calibration standard, requiring no preparation or dilution prior to use7.
  • Note: AMCO turbidity standards are one version of SDVB standards that is recognized by the US EPA for the calibration of turbidity meters and is approved for use in EPA Method 180.1. It was developed by an American Company, Advanced Polymer Systems, in 19824,7.

 

While formazin remains as the accepted traceable primary standard used to define the turbidity scale2, its instability, toxicity, and difficulty in handling makes it challenging for routine use. As such, SDVB standards are safer, more stable and easier to handle compared to formazin, while maintaining traceability2, for accurate turbidity calibrations. This ensures that measurements obtained using SDVB remain consistent, while improving operational efficiency. It is also more practical for routine usage in the field, while ensuring rigorous accuracy of the instrument, without the human errors associated with manual formazin preparation. In modern turbidity measurement workflows, SDVB standards provide a practical balance between traceability and operational efficiency, making it the preferred choice for routine applications. 


HORIBA’s TB220 Turbidity Meter is designed, programmed, and calibrated to work with HORIBA’s SDVB turbidity standards, and performance is not guaranteed if turbidity standards from other manufacturers are used with the TB220

References and Suggested Readings
1Formazine. (2025, March 14). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Formazine&oldid=1286902071
2Buzoianu, M. (2000). Practical considerations on the traceability to conventional scales.Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 5(4), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007690050433 
3Papacosta, K. (n.d.). Turbidity calibration standards evaluated from a different perspective.APS Analytical Standards Inc.https://www.comm-tec.com/library/Technical_Papers/Various/cool/kemon-test.pdf
4Barron, J. J. (2005). Turbidity standards and reference materials (Technical Paper).Reagecon Diagnostics Ltd.https://knowledge.reagecon.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Turbidity-Standards-and-Reference-Materials.pdf
5Kitchener, B. G. B., Wainwright, J., & Parsons, A. J. (2017). A review of the principles of turbidity measurement. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 41(5), 620–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317726540 
6American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, & Water Environment Federation. (1992).Method 2130: Turbidity. In Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (18th ed.). https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/002/apha.method.2130.1992.pdf 
7U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1993).Method 180.1: Determination of turbidity by nephelometry (Revision 2.0). Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/method_180-1_1993.pdf
8Snazelle, T. T. (2020). Field comparison of five in situ turbidity sensors (Open-File Report 2020-1123). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201123 
9International Organization for Standardization. (2016).Water quality — Determination of turbidity — Part 1: Quantitative methods (ISO Standard No. 7027-1:2016). https://www.iso.org/standard/62801.html

Revision 0, 9 June 2026

Water & Liquid Corporate